Skip to main content

Tag: journals

Wheat rust expert Bob McIntosh, of the Plant Breeding Institute, University of Sydney, Australia, examining rust symptoms on a wheat line in Kenya. (Photo: Petr Kosina/CIMMYT)

New publications: Special collection on wheat genetics and breeding

Written by Emma Orchardson on . Posted in Publications. 2 Comments on New publications: Special collection on wheat genetics and breeding

Global wheat production is currently facing great challenges, from increasing climate variation to occurrence of various pests and diseases. These factors continue to limit wheat production in a number of countries, including China, where in 2018 unseasonably cold temperatures resulted in yield reduction of more than 10% in major wheat growing regions. Around the same time, Fusarium head blight spread from the Yangtze region to the Yellow and Huai Valleys, and northern China experienced a shortage of irrigated water.

In light of these ongoing challenges, international collaboration, as well as the development of new technologies and their integration with existing ones, has a key role to play in supporting sustainable wheat improvement, especially in developing countries. The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) has been collaborating with China on wheat improvement for over 40 years, driving significant progress in a number of areas.

Notably, a standardized protocol for testing Chinese noodle quality has been established, as has a methodology for breeding adult-plant resistance to yellow rust, leaf rust and powdery mildew. More than 330 cultivars derived from CIMMYT germplasm have been released in the country and are currently grown over 9% of the Chinese wheat production area, while physiological approaches have been used to characterize yield potential and develop high-efficiency phenotyping platforms. The development of climate-resilient cultivars using new technology will be a priority area for future collaboration.

In a special issue of Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering focused on wheat genetics and breeding, CIMMYT researchers present highlights from global progress in wheat genomics, breeding for disease resistance, as well as quality improvement, in a collection of nine review articles and one research article. They emphasize the significance of using new technology for genotyping and phenotyping when developing new cultivars, as well as the importance of global collaboration in responding to ongoing challenges.

In a paper on wheat stem rust, CIMMYT scientists Sridhar Bhavani, David Hodson, Julio Huerta-Espino, Mandeep Randawa and Ravi Singh discuss progress in breeding for resistance to Ug99 and other races of stem rust fungus, complex virulence combinations of which continue to pose a significant threat to global wheat production. The authors detail how effective gene stewardship and new generation breeding materials, complemented by active surveillance and monitoring, have helped to limit major epidemics and increase grain yield potential in key target environments.

In the same issue, an article by Caiyun Lui et al. discusses the application of spectral reflectance indices (SRIs) as proxies to screen for yield potential and heat stress, which is emerging in crop breeding programs. The results of a recent study, which evaluated 287 elite lines, highlight the utility of SRIs as proxies for grain yield. High heritability estimates and the identification of marker-trait associations indicate that SRIs are useful tools for understanding the genetic basis of agronomic and physiological traits.

Other papers by CIMMYT researchers discuss the history, activities and impact of the International Winter Wheat Improvement Program, as well as the ongoing work on the genetic improvement of wheat grain quality at CIMMYT.

Find the full collection of articles in Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Volume 6, Issue 3, September 2019.

See more recent publications by CIMMYT researchers:

  1. Genetic diversity among tropical provitamin A maize inbred lines and implications for a biofortification program. 2019. Julius Pyton Sserumaga, Makumbi, D., Warburton, M.L., Opiyo, S.O., Asea, G., Muwonge, A., Kasozi, C.L. In: Cereal Research Communications v. 47, no. 1, p. 134-144.
  2. Diversity and conservation priorities of crop wild relatives in Mexico. 2019. Contreras-Toledo, A. R., Cortes-Cruz, M. A., Costich, D.E., Rico-Arce, M. de L., Magos Brehm, J., Maxted, N. In: Plant Genetic Resources: Characterisation and Utilisation v. 17, no. 2, p. 140-150.
  3. Global wheat production with 1.5 and 2.0°C above pre-industrial warming. 2019. Bing Liu, Martre, P., Ewert, F., Porter, J.R., Challinor, A.J., Muller, C., Ruane, A.C., Waha, K., Thorburn, P.J., Aggarwal, P.K., Mukhtar Ahmed, Balkovic, J., Basso, B., Biernath, C., Bindi, M., Cammarano, D., De Sanctis, G., Dumont, B., Espadafor, M., Eyshi Rezaei, E., Ferrise, R., Garcia-Vila, M., Gayler, S., Yujing Gao, Horan, H., Hoogenboom, G., Izaurralde, R.C., Jones, C.D., Kassie, B.T., Kersebaum, K.C., Klein, C., Koehler, A.K., Maiorano, A., Minoli, S., Montesino San Martin, M., Soora Naresh Kumar, Nendel, C., O’Leary, G.J., Palosuo, T., Priesack, E., Ripoche, D.,Rotter, R., Semenov, M.A., Stockle, C., Streck, T., Supit, I., Fulu Tao, Van der Velde, M., Wallach, D., Wang, E. |Webber, H., Wolf, J., Liujun Xiao, Zhao Zhang, Zhigan Zhao, Yan Zhu, Asseng, S. In: Global Change Biology v. 25, no. 4, p. 1428-1444.
  4. Marker Assisted Breeding to Develop Multiple Stress Tolerant Varieties for Flood and Drought Prone Areas. 2019. Sandhu, N., Dixit, S., Mallikarjuna Swamy, B.P., Raman, A.K., Kumar, S., Singh, S.P., Yadaw, R.B., Singh, O.N., Reddy, J.N., Anandan, A., Yadav, S., Venkataeshwarllu, C., Henry, A., Verulkar, S., Mandal, N.P., Ram, T., Badri, J., Vikram, P., Arvind Kumar In: Rice v. 12, no. 1, art. 8.
  5. Modeling Genotype × Environment Interaction Using a Factor Analytic Model of On-Farm Wheat Trials in the Yaqui Valley of Mexico. 2019. Vargas-Hernández, M., Ortiz-Monasterio, I., Perez-Rodriguez, P., Montesinos-Lopez, O.A., Montesinos-Lopez, A., Burgueño, J., Crossa, J. In: Agronomy Journal v. 111, no. 1, p. 1-11.
  6. Does Size Matter? A Critical Review of Meta-analysis in Agronomy. 2019. Krupnik, T.J., Andersson, J.A., Rusinamhodzi, L., Corbeels, M., Shennan, C., Gerard, B. In: Experimental Agriculture v. 55 no. Special issue 2, p. 200-229.
  7. Effects of tillage, crop establishment and diversification on soil organic carbon, aggregation, aggregate associated carbon and productivity in cereal systems of semi-arid Northwest India. 2019. Jat, H.S., Datta, A., Choudhary, M., Yadav, A.K., Choudhary, V., Sharma, P.C., Gathala, M.K., Jat, M.L., McDonald, A. In: Soil and Tillage Research v. 190, p. 128-138.
  8. Transgenic solutions to increase yield and stability in wheat: shining hope or flash in the pan? 2019. Araus, J.L., Serret, M.D., Lopes, M.S. In: Journal of Experimental Botany v. 70, no. 5, p. 1419-1424.
  9. Model-Driven Multidisciplinary Global Research to Meet Future Needs: The Case for “Improving Radiation Use Efficiency to Increase Yield.” 2019. Asseng, S., Martre, P., Ewert, F., Dreccer, M.F., Beres, B.L., Reynolds, M.P., Braun, H.J., Langridge, P., Gouis, J. Le., Salse, J., Baenziger, P.S. In: Crop Science v. 59, p. 1-7.
  10. Proteome analysis of biofilm produced by a Fusarium falciforme keratitis infectious agent. 2019. Calvillo-Medina, R.P., Reyes‐Grajeda, J.P., Barba‐Escoto, L., Bautista-Hernandez, L.A., Campos‐Guillen, J., Jones, G.H., Bautista‐de Lucio, V.M. In: Microbial Pathogenesis v. 130, p. 232-241.

How to get your high-impact research published in leading journals: top tips from the Senior Editor of Nature Genetics

Written by on . Posted in Features.

At CIMMYT’s Science Week 2018, Nature Genetics Senior Editor Catherine Potenski spoke on how to publish plant genomics research that has broad, novel impact.

Catherine Potenski, Senior Editor of Nature Genetics, talks to participants of CIMMYT's Science Week on June 26, 2018. (Photo: Alfonso Cortés/CIMMYT)
Catherine Potenski, Senior Editor of Nature Genetics, talks to participants of CIMMYT’s Science Week on June 26, 2018. (Photo: Alfonso Cortés/CIMMYT)

Having research that is high-impact is not only critical to doing excellent science that has meaning, but also a premier way to let the research community know what you are doing and reach a broader audience, according to Catherine Potenski, Senior Editor at Nature Genetics, one of the more than 70 high-quality academic journals of publishing company Springer Nature.

“Plant genomics is an exciting field that is a priority for Nature Genetics given climate change and other challenges,” said Potenski. “We look for studies with novelty, a genetics scope and resource value.”

Nature Genetics is highly selective and publishes approximately 200 papers per year. Potenski wants to make the editorial review process more productive and simple for researchers so they can share their best work.

“You should organize your paper to highlight the impact of the findings and write a cover letter that places your work in context, highlighting what gap of knowledge it fills and how others will use this research,” explained Potenski. In addition, scientists should target the right journal for their research. In case of doubt, they can send a pre-submission inquiry and work with editors.

Impact is not always immediate, and the impact factor is not necessarily a good or proven metric. “The first CRISPR articles published in the early 2000s are now very impactful, but nobody knew the impact they would have then. Just because it is not in a high-impact journal, it does not mean it is not high-impact,” she said.

Potenski shared the six questions plant researchers should ask themselves when submitting research to Nature Genetics.

  1. Is my main approach genetic?

Your main analyses should be based on genetic screens, Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) mapping, genome re-sequencing or other genetic approaches. If the main analysis of a paper is in transcriptomics, imaging or biochemistry, this could be considered off scope (but fine if they are secondary analyses).

  1. Are the findings highly novel?

Your research should reflect a new method or finding that is really groundbreaking. Findings that just provide insight into a known process, are confirmatory or incremental do not meet Nature’s standards. If the finding is only new for a specific crop, that might also not be sufficiently novel.

  1. Is there a large user group for the data?

Bigger is usually always better; you want your research to apply to or benefit as many people as possible. If the crop you are studying is widely consumed like wheat, or you have a large study scope such as large-scale GWAS (Genome-Wide Association Study) analysis, that will impact many more people than if you are studying watermelons using single QTL mapping.

  1. Is this a very large or unique dataset?

You want large, high-quality datasets and analyses that are unique and other groups cannot easily repeat. Ideally this leads to a new approach in your field. Data that are open and easily available, and studies using the latest technologies also get priority.

  1. Do the findings provide biological insights?

You want people reading your study to learn something new about plant biology. Instead of merely reporting domestication patterns, you want something new about the mechanisms of evolution or adaptation. Editors look for comprehensive, molecular mechanistic insight into the processes studied.

  1. Is there evidence for crop improvement?

Editors prioritize studies with potential for crop improvement, especially in the context of climate change and food security. You want your research to be demonstrated in a crop plant, ideally in the physical plant and not in a model simulation.